Summary
Load this skill to organize arguments, outlines, and content structures into non-overlapping, comprehensive categories using the MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) framework. The agent can diagnose structural gaps and redundancies in written content and produce logically sound outlines for articles, guides, and documentation.
SKILL.MD
Structure arguments and outlines using the MECE framework
When to Activate
Load this skill when you need to:
- Create article outlines that avoid gaps or redundancy
- Structure arguments, presentations, or documentation
- Break down complex topics into non-overlapping sections
- Review existing content for logical completeness
- Organize information categories for any written deliverable
Core Knowledge
What MECE is: Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive. A structuring principle where categories don't overlap (ME) and don't miss anything important (CE).
Why it matters: Most content fails in one of two ways: it either repeats the same point across sections (not ME) or skips obvious components (not CE). MECE prevents both failures.
MECE's role in your workflow: MECE tells you WHAT to cover. It pairs with other frameworks:
- Pyramid Principle tells you what order to present it
- BLUF tells you how to open
- But MECE comes first — without complete, non-overlapping coverage, sequencing and clarity won't save you
Example of ME failure (overlap):
- Section 1: "Setting up accounts"
- Section 2: "Configuring their email"
- Problem: Email is an account type, so you're covering the same ground twice
Example of CE failure (gaps): An onboarding guide that covers accounts and email but skips equipment ordering isn't collectively exhaustive — new hires can't start without a laptop.
Constraints / Hard Rules
- Every section must be distinct from others (no overlap)
- Together, sections must fully answer the core question (no gaps)
- Don't outline based on your research journey — outline based on what readers need
- Sections should carry roughly similar weight (wildly uneven word counts signal structural problems)
- Content should be only as long as the topic requires
Workflow
Step 1: Identify the Core Question
Every piece of content answers a question, even if unstated. Write it down explicitly.
Example: "How to Build a Content Marketing Pipeline" answers: What steps do I need to take to build a content marketing pipeline?
List every component needed to fully answer it — nothing more, nothing less.
Step 2: Choose a Logical Structure
Select the structure that fits your topic type:
For how-to content: Use chronological process structure (before, during, after)
Example for content pipeline:
- Before you write: Plan three months of content
- During writing: Produce articles consistently
- After publishing: Evaluate and analyze performance
Each phase is distinct (ME). Together they cover the full process (CE).
For other content types: Choose structures that naturally partition the topic without overlap:
- Cost vs revenue (for financial decisions)
- Internal vs external (for organizational topics)
- Strategic vs tactical (for planning content)
Step 3: Estimate Section Length
Assign rough word counts to each section. Use this as a structural diagnostic:
- Wildly uneven sections → one is too broad or too granular
- Total word count → validates scope matches the topic
Example allocation for 1,500-2,000 word article:
- Introduction: ~100 words
- Section 1: ~500 words
- Section 2: ~500 words
- Section 3: ~500 words
- Conclusion: ~100 words
Step 4: Test for Common Failures
Test for gaps (CE failure): Does the title promise something your sections don't deliver?
Bad outline for "How to Build a Content Marketing Pipeline":
- Section 1: Why it's important to have a content marketing pipeline
- Section 2: What makes a great content marketing pipeline
- Section 3: How to build a content marketing pipeline
Problem: 2 of 3 sections skip the actual "how to." You'd produce 2,000 words that skirt the topic, with context-setting too long and the meaty content too short.
Test for overlap (ME failure): Do any sections cover the same ground from different angles?
Bad outline for "How to Build a Content Marketing Pipeline":
- Section 1: How to plan your content pipeline
- Section 2: How to build your editorial calendar
- Section 3: How to measure content performance
Problem: Sections 1 and 2 overlap. Planning your pipeline IS building your calendar — same activity, different descriptions. Readers will feel the repetition.
Step 5: Refine Until MECE
Adjust sections until:
- Each section covers distinct territory (no overlap test)
- All sections together fully answer the core question (no gaps test)
- Section lengths are balanced relative to their importance
Output Contract
When applying this skill, you should produce:
For outline creation:
- Clear core question statement
- Section headings that are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive
- Word count estimates per section
- Verification that structure matches topic type (chronological for how-to, logical partitioning for others)
For content review:
- Identification of overlapping sections (ME failures)
- Identification of missing components (CE failures)
- Recommended restructuring to achieve MECE compliance
Source: MECE: How to Think, Write & Persuade Like a McKinsey Consultant